Give self-funded clients an independent view of healthcare prices, network performance, and high-cost claims using commercial negotiated rates and market benchmarks.
In short
Benefits consultants and health captives can use price transparency data to independently compare employer healthcare costs with commercial market rates. Gigasheet can benchmark specific claims or providers, analyze entire markets, and use AI-assisted comparable selection when the relevant comparison depends on payer, provider, service, geography, sample sufficiency, or client-defined rules.
An employer's claims data shows what the plan paid. It does not show whether those prices were competitive. The carrier's own reporting compares the plan with the carrier's book, which is not the same as the market. To answer the question a client is actually asking, a consultant needs a reference point that neither the plan nor the carrier controls.
Published commercial negotiated rates provide one. They show what every major payer has agreed to pay each provider for each service in the client's markets, which lets a consultant evaluate the client's network, its high-cost claims, and its carrier's negotiated position against the market rather than against a vendor's summary of it.
Each of these is a market question, and each can be answered with commercial negotiated rates, Medicare context, and provider data the consultant does not have to assemble.
A captive manager or a consultant with many self-funded clients faces the same market questions at scale. Gigasheet supports aggregation across employer groups so repeatable benchmarks, high-cost claim analysis, and network comparisons can run across a book while each client's claims data stays governed under its own terms. The market data is shared; the client data is not.
Typical captive uses include identifying facilities that are expensive across multiple member groups, comparing the networks used by different members in the same market, and building standard market benchmarks that every member report draws from.
A market median for a CPT code in a metro is a starting point. It is not always the right comparison for a specific claim. The facility may be a teaching hospital in a market of community hospitals; the payer may have unusual leverage; the service may have too few local observations to trust.
Gigasheet's AI-assisted comparable selection honors the consultant's methodology. It can hold the same payer first, prioritize facility peers, require a minimum observation count before broadening, or apply whatever ordering the consultant has defined, and it returns the comparison set and underlying records on request so the analysis can be shown to the client.
Illustrative. Values are synthetic and do not represent any real employer, provider, payer, or customer.
| Attribute | Value |
|---|---|
| Client | Self-funded manufacturer, 1,400 employees, single Southeastern metro |
| Claim | MS-DRG 460, spinal fusion except cervical without MCC |
| Facility | 410-bed regional health system flagship |
| Network | Carrier's broad PPO |
| Allowed amount | $84,600 |
What the consultant found
| Reference | Value |
|---|---|
| Median negotiated rate, same DRG, same facility, all commercial PPOs | $71,300 |
| Median, same DRG, comparable facilities in the metro, all commercial PPOs (n = 27) | $62,800 |
| Client's allowed amount versus comparable-facility median | 35% higher |
| Client's allowed amount, percentile within comparable set | 91st |
| Geographically adjusted Medicare | $27,900 |
| Client's allowed amount as multiple of Medicare | 3.0x |
How it framed the conversation
The carrier's contracted rate at this facility is above the market for comparable facilities, and the client's plan sent its most expensive spine cases there. That is an advisory finding about network design and steerage, supported by market evidence. It is not a finding that the carrier underperformed or that the claim was paid incorrectly; the contract may be sound, and the facility may be the appropriate site of care. The consultant's job is to show the client the market and let the client decide what to do about it.
Where a client's plan-specific payer file is available and commercially appropriate, Gigasheet can process it as an optional add-on so the consultant works from the plan's own negotiated rates alongside national comparison data. If the file is not available, the national data still supports network and provider benchmarking for the client's markets.
| Need | Delivery |
|---|---|
| Repeatable benchmarks across a book of business | Price Transparency API |
| Modeling, actuarial work, large market studies | Bulk Data delivered to the consultant's environment |
| Analyst exploration and one-off client questions | Interactive analysis in Gigasheet |
| Claims that need a reasoned comparison | AI-assisted comparable selection with underlying records on request |
| Provider-level positioning summaries | Provider Rate Scores and market benchmarks |
To benchmark a client's claims and allowed amounts against commercial market rates, compare networks and payers in the client's markets, identify unusually expensive providers, and give renewal and network decisions a reference point the plan and the carrier do not control.
Yes, when the claim is matched to published rates on service, provider or facility characteristics, payer context, and market, with enough observations to form a distribution. Published rates are negotiated amounts, not paid claims, so the comparison shows where the plan's price sits in the market.
By comparing negotiated rates for the same codes at the same providers, or at comparable providers, across the payers or networks under consideration in the client's geography. The result shows which network has the stronger negotiated position for the services that matter to the client.
Yes, as independent pricing context. A high-dollar claim can be compared with what the same facility has negotiated with other payers and with what comparable facilities in the market have negotiated, alongside Medicare, to show whether the price was in line with the market.
A reference point that is not produced by the plan, the carrier, or the provider. Published commercial negotiated rates and geographically adjusted Medicare rates are independent in this sense; a carrier's book-of-business comparison is not.
Yes. Market benchmarks and provider analysis run across a captive's members using shared market data, while each member's claims remain governed under its own agreement. This supports captive-wide findings about expensive facilities, network differences, and standard benchmarks.
Yes, as an optional add-on, where the file is available and commercially appropriate. The plan's own rates are then analyzed alongside the national comparison data.
The AI-assisted endpoint evaluates alternative comparison paths under the consultant's methodology, relaxing geography, payer set, facility characteristics, or service basis in the approved order, and reports a benchmark only once the comparison set meets the minimum observation threshold.